Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0429

reference
412-tree-1
name
0429
tree-preservation-order

undefined

412-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.022316 50.890724)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022246 50.890717,-1.022249 50.890731,-1.022259 50.890743,-1.022274 50.890753,-1.022294 50.890760,-1.022316 50.890762,-1.022338 50.890760,-1.022358 50.890754,-1.022374 50.890744,-1.022384 50.890732,-1.022388 50.890718,-1.022384 50.890704,-1.022375 50.890691,-1.022359 50.890681,-1.022339 50.890675,-1.022318 50.890672,-1.022296 50.890674,-1.022276 50.890680,-1.022260 50.890690,-1.022249 50.890703,-1.022246 50.890717)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL